How these guides are written, and how to correct them

Who writes these

Every article on this site is written by Akshit Ahuja, who also builds the tools. There is no content team, no freelancer pool and no guest posts. If a page has a byline, that person wrote it.

The conflict of interest, stated plainly

Most of these guides end up recommending a tool on this site, because the tools were built to solve the problems the guides describe. That is a real conflict and it is disclosed in the body of each article rather than buried here.

Two things limit the damage. The tools are free, so there is no revenue attached to the recommendation. And every article explains the manual method first, so the advice still works if you never touch the tool.

There are no affiliate links anywhere on this site, no sponsored content and no paid placements. If that ever changes, it will be labelled on the page, not in a policy nobody reads.

What counts as a source

Claims fall into three buckets, and each is handled differently:

• Verifiable facts about how a system behaves are linked to the primary source, usually the marketplace’s own panel or the documentation of the software involved.
• Operational estimates, such as how long a task takes or the volume at which a printer pays for itself, are labelled as estimates from practice. They come from running small seller operations, not from a controlled study, and the articles say so.
• Market statistics are only used when a specific, dated source can be cited. Where a number would be useful but no source exists, the article leaves it out rather than inventing a plausible figure.

Review before publishing

Each guide is checked against a written quality rubric before it goes live, covering intent match, structure, evidence, disclosure and factual consistency. Where a check fails, either the article is fixed or the gap is stated openly in the article itself.

This site is a one-person project, so there is no second human reviewer. That is a real limitation and worth knowing when you weigh the advice.

Corrections

If something here is wrong, tell me and I will fix it. Message +91 99887 44669 on WhatsApp or open an issue on GitHub.

How corrections are handled:

• Factual errors are corrected in place and the article’s last-reviewed date is updated.
• Material corrections, meaning ones that change the advice, get a note at the point of the change saying what was wrong and when it was fixed.
• Typos and clarity edits are made silently.

Because the whole site is public on GitHub, every edit to every article has a timestamped diff. You do not have to take my word for what changed, you can read the commit.

Updates

Marketplace panels change. Guides are reviewed when something they describe visibly changes, and the last-reviewed date at the foot of each article tells you when that last happened. A date that looks old means nothing has changed, not that the page was abandoned.

Privacy · Terms · About